DCFR complete report set preview

Before the full report

Preliminary 20-site screening

01

Capacity is a scenario, not a conclusion

When acreage is supplied, DCFR calculates a land-based arithmetic range from stated area-intensity and reserve assumptions. It does not establish buildable, permitted, or utility-supported capacity.

02

Land fit remains confirmation-gated

The current automated report compares area allowances and records parcel, assemblage, access, environmental, and layout confirmation items. A surveyed dimensioned test fit and route validation are separate work.

03

Utility evidence stays distinct from demand

The report records supplied power-path evidence, calculates facility-demand scenarios, and leaves service capacity, upgrades, tariffs, and energization unconfirmed until supported.

04

Open decisions have named follow-up

DCFR organizes calculations, findings, evidence limits, and next actions so utility, civil, code, MEP, cost, schedule, and design teams have a clearer starting point.

Selected-site report

What the selected full DCFR report includes

One selected parcel advances into a planning-grade DCFR report organized into seven modules. Each module separates DCFR findings, planning assumptions, and confirmation-required items.

01

Submitted candidates · Area scenarios · Confirmation gates
DCFR output

Candidate Site Screening

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

01

Candidate Site Screening

Submitted candidate count

Arithmetic area-scenario status

Acquisition hold while critical evidence is open

Candidate Site Screening — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Shows the submitted-candidate comparison, arithmetic area status, evidence gaps, and acquisition hold used before one candidate advances into a selected-site report.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Submitted candidate count
  • Arithmetic area-scenario status
  • Acquisition hold while critical evidence is open
  • Missing-data and parcel-identity flags
  • Candidate comparison basis

02

Source evidence · Code questions · AHJ confirmation
DCFR output

Zoning, Building & Fire Code Feasibility

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

02

Zoning, Building & Fire Code Feasibility

Available district-map evidence; use permission unconfirmed

Assumed floors for area arithmetic only

Building area, height, construction type, and egress questions

Zoning, Building & Fire Code Feasibility — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Records available district-map evidence and organizes permitted-use, adopted-code, fire-access, equipment-separation, and approval questions. Parcel-wide applicability and authority determinations remain unconfirmed.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Available district-map evidence; use permission unconfirmed
  • Assumed floors for area arithmetic only
  • Building area, height, construction type, and egress questions
  • Fire access and equipment-separation questions
  • Entitlement and fire-review confirmation register
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

District / use

Point-map district when an audited source is available / use unconfirmed

Parcel-wide zoning, overlays, permitted use, and entitlement require authority confirmation.

Code and fire basis

Open confirmation register

Adopted editions, amendments, occupancy, construction type, egress, accessibility, fire access, and equipment controls require project-specific review.

Public preview only. The generated report records planning questions and source limits; it does not provide a licensed code analysis, NFPA determination, fire-protection design, or AHJ approval.

03

Demand scenario · Evidence maturity · Open utility gates
DCFR output

Power & Utility Feasibility

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

03

Power & Utility Feasibility

Facility-demand and annual-energy scenarios

Submitted power-supply pathway

Evidence maturity and open dependencies

Power & Utility Feasibility — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Calculates a facility-demand scenario, classifies the supplied power pathway and evidence stage, checks stated capacity arithmetic, and keeps service capacity and energization unconfirmed.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Facility-demand and annual-energy scenarios
  • Submitted power-supply pathway
  • Evidence maturity and open dependencies
  • Claimed or unit-derived capacity arithmetic check
  • Utility upgrades, tariff, commercial terms, and energization open
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Facility demand

Target IT MW multiplied by the stated PUE range

This is a demand scenario, not available utility capacity.

Power pathway

Submitted source type and evidence stage

Point of interconnection, upgrades, tariff, commercial terms, and energization remain confirmation gates.

04

Thermal scenarios · Source findings · Required studies
DCFR output

Cooling, Water, Noise & Environmental Feasibility

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

04

Cooling, Water, Noise & Environmental Feasibility

Cooling preference and average rack-density assumption

Equivalent full-load rack-count scenario

Annual energy and onsite-water scenarios when inputs are supplied

Cooling, Water, Noise & Environmental Feasibility — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Records the cooling preference, calculates annual energy and onsite-water scenarios when inputs are supplied, retains environmental-source findings, and identifies climate, service, discharge, and acoustic studies still required.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Cooling preference and average rack-density assumption
  • Equivalent full-load rack-count scenario
  • Annual energy and onsite-water scenarios when inputs are supplied
  • Environmental evidence and retrieval gaps
  • Climate, water/sewer, discharge, and acoustic confirmation items
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Thermal and water scenario

Calculated only from supplied PUE, WUE, load, and operating assumptions

Peak conditions, climate selection, service, discharge, and equipment performance remain open.

Environmental and noise evidence

Available source findings plus explicit retrieval gaps

Point-based public data cannot clear a parcel; acoustic compliance requires equipment and receptor data.

05

Area arithmetic · Reserve allowances · Physical-fit hold
DCFR output

Parcel Capacity & Site-Fit Model

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

05

Parcel Capacity & Site-Fit Model

Land-based IT range when target MW is absent

Customer-entered area scenario when target MW is supplied

White-space, gross-building, and support-yard allowances

Parcel Capacity & Site-Fit Model — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Shows a land-based arithmetic range when no target MW is supplied, or an area budget against a stated target. Parcel identity, buildable geometry, access, and physical fit remain confirmation-gated.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Land-based IT range when target MW is absent
  • Customer-entered area scenario when target MW is supplied
  • White-space, gross-building, and support-yard allowances
  • Circulation, stormwater, exclusion, and expansion reserves
  • Parcel or assemblage conflicts and physical-fit next steps
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Area result

Land arithmetic range or target-demand area budget

Neither result establishes a parcel, buildable envelope, legal access, or physical fit.

Physical planning

Confirmation items and withheld release controls

Surveyed constraints, routes, grades, drainage, equipment, and reviewed geometry are separate acceptance evidence.

06

Program arithmetic · Design questions · Logistics review
DCFR output

Structure, Envelope & Constructability

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

06

Structure, Envelope & Constructability

Gross-building program range

Assumed floor count for footprint arithmetic

Exterior equipment-yard allowance

Structure, Envelope & Constructability — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Frames floor-count, structural, ground-condition, envelope, delivery, laydown, and equipment-replacement questions. It does not select an assembly or establish structural capacity.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Gross-building program range
  • Assumed floor count for footprint arithmetic
  • Exterior equipment-yard allowance
  • Foundation, load, clear-height, and envelope questions
  • Delivery, lifting, laydown, and replacement-path prompts
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Program basis

Gross area, assumed floors, and exterior equipment-yard allowance

No structural capacity, wall section, material selection, or measured quantity is established.

Constructability

Ground, load, delivery, lifting, laydown, and replacement-path questions

Geotechnical, structural, contractor, vendor, and operations review remains required.

07

Conditional calculations · Decision gates · Risk actions
DCFR output

Cost, Schedule, Risk & Decision Record

DCFRILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MODULE COVER

MODULE

07

Cost, Schedule, Risk & Decision Record

Conditional capital sensitivity from supplied rates

Requested schedule recorded as an uncommitted target

First-commitment and design-release gates

Cost, Schedule, Risk & Decision Record — illustrative module artwork
Data Center Feasibility ReportPlanning findings · Assumptions · Confirmation items

Shows cost sensitivity only when dated customer rates are supplied, records a requested schedule when present, and organizes decision gates, risks, owners, and next actions without promising cost or delivery.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Conditional capital sensitivity from supplied rates
  • Requested schedule recorded as an uncommitted target
  • First-commitment and design-release gates
  • Unpriced scope and unknown durations
  • Risk register, owners, and next-step actions
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Cost

Not estimated unless low and high customer rates are supplied

Any displayed range is a sensitivity, not a quotation or independent cost opinion.

Schedule and decision

Customer target plus dependency and evidence gates

No utility, AHJ, vendor, contractor, or completion-date commitment is inferred.

Methodology

What DCFR is based on

DCFR combines user-provided site inputs, rule-based data center planning logic, visible site/context constraints, and planning-grade calculation assumptions to produce an early feasibility judgment. Outputs clearly separate calculated assumptions from items that require utility, civil, code, environmental, legal, or licensed professional confirmation.

01

Client-provided inputs

Candidate addresses, parcel references, acreage, target program intent, assumptions, and any shared site context.

02

Available source evidence

Retrieved official-source records are cited with status and limitations. Point queries do not establish parcel-wide conditions, and unavailable sources remain unresolved.

03

Planning calculation logic

Demand, energy, area, reserve, and optional cost scenarios use documented formulas and input origins. They do not establish buildability or market benchmarks.

04

Explicit planning assumptions

Customer inputs and DCFR scenario defaults remain identified so project-specific professional inputs can replace them.

05

Findings and confirmation actions

The report records risks, evidence gaps, responsible parties, and next-step questions for utility, civil, code, MEP, cost, schedule, and design teams.

ARCHITECT-LED

Architect-led feasibility intelligence

DCFR was created by Jeehee Hong, NCARB, AIA, LEED GA, a New York State Registered Architect with 20+ years of experience across architecture, site planning, mixed-use development, logistics, and mission-critical feasibility thinking.

The platform is designed to help brokers, land teams, developers, investors, and site-selection teams screen data center land before deeper consultant engagement.

Architect-led does not mean the report is stamped, sealed, permit-ready, or a substitute for local licensed engineering, legal, zoning, environmental, utility, or code review.

SCOPE NOTE

What DCFR does not provide

DCFR is a planning-grade decision-support package. Final acquisition, design, permitting, financing, and construction decisions require professional confirmation. DCFR does not provide final engineering, stamped drawings, permit approval, legal zoning opinion, utility capacity guarantee, environmental clearance, contractor pricing, or authority approval.

  • Final engineering, stamped drawings, permit approval, construction documents, or permit drawings
  • Legal zoning opinion, entitlement approval, land-use approval, environmental clearance, brokerage advice, appraisal, lending advice, or investment advice
  • Utility capacity guarantee, interconnection approval, power reservation, tariff confirmation, or substation upgrade commitment
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, wetlands delineation, geotechnical report, ALTA/NSPS survey, traffic study, hydrology report, or acoustic engineering report
  • Final construction cost, guaranteed schedule, contractor pricing, equipment procurement pricing, or authority approval

Ready to compare candidate sites before acquisition momentum takes over?

Order the DCFR Report Package, submit the candidate addresses or parcel links you are considering, and advance the strongest site into a planning-grade selected-site report.