Sample Report Preview

DCFR Sample Report

Planning-grade technical site-layout and report-output preview. See the seven-module report package, calculated site-fit logic, transparent assumptions, confirmation-ready next steps, and selected-site output style without exposing the full calculation engine.

Geographic basis: DCFR uses U.S.-oriented and IBC-based planning assumptions unless otherwise noted. For non-U.S. sites, local building code, fire code, land-use, utility, environmental, and permitting requirements must be confirmed by qualified local professionals and authorities.

DCFR complete report set preview

Before the full report

Preliminary 20-site screening

01

Capacity is discovered, not assumed

DCFR estimates an achievable MW range from buildable envelope, power exposure, cooling and water risk, access, stormwater, buffers, and expansion constraints.

02

Land fit is tested as a system

The sample checks building geometry, support yards, truck and loading access, fire access, parking allowance, stormwater, sensitive edges, and future expansion together.

03

Utility risk is treated as a feasibility gate

The report separates near-power claims from realistic utility exposure, power path, phasing risk, power gap, and time-to-power concerns.

04

The output is consultant-ready

DCFR organizes findings so utility, civil, code, MEP, cost, schedule, and design teams have a cleaner starting point.

Selected-site report

What the selected full DCFR report includes

One selected parcel advances into a planning-grade DCFR report organized into seven modules. Each module separates DCFR findings, planning assumptions, and confirmation-required items.

01

Public screening concept
DCFR output

Candidate Site Screening

Candidate Site Screening

Shows the 20-site screening structure, recommendation status, and candidate comparison basis used before one parcel advances into the selected-site report.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • 20-site shortlist logic
  • Feasibility score
  • Recommendation status
  • Missing-data flags
  • Candidate comparison basis

02

Capacity model · Site-fit logic · Confirmation flags
DCFR output

Parcel Capacity + Site-Fit Model

Parcel Capacity + Site-Fit Model

Explains the selected parcel's planning capacity range, usable site envelope, circulation needs, stormwater reserve, and expansion fit so teams can see how the site can realistically support the program.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Estimated achievable MW range
  • Usable buildable envelope
  • Building / yard fit
  • Truck/loading/fire route exposure
  • Parking allowance
  • Stormwater and expansion reserve

03

Power path · Utility exposure · Phasing risk
DCFR output

Power + Utility Feasibility

Power + Utility Feasibility

Reviews power feasibility, utility path exposure, substation/transmission context, electrical yard assumptions, power gap, and phasing or mitigation prompts.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Power feasibility verdict
  • Facility load / power gap exposure
  • Utility path exposure
  • Substation / transmission proximity
  • Transformer / electrical yard assumptions
  • Phasing or compensation options
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Utility exposure

Moderate

Service capacity, delivery voltage, and schedule remain utility-confirmation gates.

Substation / transmission proximity logic

Map nearest substations, transmission corridors, and likely crossing constraints

Distance is treated as exposure, not as available capacity.

Electrical yard allowance

Reserve east-edge utility / transformer yard plus maintenance access

Yard sizing is carried as a planning allowance for consultant refinement.

Transformer / generator assumptions

Pad-mounted transformer zone and N+1 generator/fuel planning basis

Equipment counts and fuel strategy require MEP and utility confirmation.

Utility confirmation register

Service inquiry, interconnection path, feeder upgrades, phasing, and tariff review

Open items are structured for direct utility follow-up.

Feasibility risk level

Medium

Proceed with utility due diligence before acquisition or schedule commitments.

04

Code exposure · Rated assemblies · Fire/life-safety · AHJ path
DCFR output

Zoning, Building Code + Fire Code Exposure

Zoning, Building Code + Fire Code Exposure

Reviews zoning and entitlement exposure, building-code assumptions, construction type, occupancy and egress considerations, fire-rated assemblies, rated separations, fire protection strategy, NFPA-related confirmation items, generator/fuel/transformer/BESS separation issues, fire apparatus access, hydrant/fire-water strategy, and AHJ permit-path prompts.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Zoning use and entitlement exposure
  • Building-code assumptions and construction type prompts
  • Occupancy, egress, and life-safety exposure
  • Fire-rated assembly and rated separation issues
  • NFPA-related fire protection confirmation items
  • Fire water, hydrant, and suppression strategy prompts
  • Generator, fuel, transformer, and BESS separation issues
  • Fire apparatus access as one part of the fire/life-safety review
  • AHJ coordination and permit-path review items
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Zoning use exposure

Industrial/data center use compatibility review

Confirm permitted use, special-use triggers, screening, and entitlement sequence.

Building code exposure

Occupancy, construction type, area/height, egress, fire protection

Planning-grade assumptions require licensed code and AHJ review.

Fire apparatus access planning

Loop road, turning geometry, hydrant/fire-water access, emergency edges

Fire marshal coordination is treated as an early critical item.

Setback / separation flags

Generators, fuel, transformers, BESS, yards, and sensitive-edge separations

Separation requirements may affect yard placement and net buildable area.

AHJ confirmation items

Planning, building official, fire marshal, utility, civil review

Open confirmation list is organized by authority or consultant owner.

Code-risk register

Medium

Manage through early AHJ meeting and code/fire consultant review.

Public preview only. The full DCFR report expands these items into supporting code-exposure notes, assumption registers, diagram prompts, risk flags, and consultant/AHJ confirmation items. DCFR does not replace licensed code, fire protection, NFPA, or AHJ review.

05

Cooling path · Water/sewer · Noise exposure
DCFR output

Cooling, Water/Sewer + Noise Feasibility

Cooling, Water/Sewer + Noise Feasibility

Reviews cooling strategy feasibility, water/sewer/discharge status, heat rejection land demand, acoustic risk, sensitive edges, and mechanical confirmation prompts.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Cooling feasibility verdict
  • Water / sewer / discharge status
  • Heat rejection land demand
  • Acoustic / sensitive-edge risk
  • Cooling strategy alternatives
  • Mechanical/acoustic risk items
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Cooling strategy fit

Air-cooled, water-cooled, and hybrid options compared

Strategy affects land demand, water exposure, noise, and schedule.

Water/sewer exposure

Source, discharge, sewer availability, and civil route to be verified

Water-dependent options remain confirmation-sensitive.

Heat rejection yard logic

Cooling yard allowance placed outside primary building/fire access zones

Final layout depends on selected mechanical strategy.

Sensitive edge / acoustic buffer

North edge buffer, equipment orientation, and acoustic handoff

Noise mitigation is addressed before entitlement risk escalates.

Mechanical and civil confirmation items

MEP basis, water/sewer letters, discharge path, acoustic scope

Follow-up tasks are ready for consultant assignment.

06

Envelope · Modular systems · Constructability
DCFR output

Design, Materials, Modular Systems + Constructability

Design, Materials, Modular Systems + Constructability

Reviews planning-grade design direction, materials strategy, modular assembly options, low-carbon pathways, construction automation opportunities, logistics, and laydown constraints.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • Facade / envelope system recommendation
  • Planning-grade wall section logic
  • Modular assembly strategy
  • Low-carbon material path
  • Robotics / construction automation opportunities
  • Laydown, logistics, and constructability constraints
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

Envelope / facade strategy

Insulated metal panel baseline with higher-performance alternatives

Balances speed, maintenance, durability, thermal performance, and appearance.

Structural grid / clear-height assumptions

Repeatable data hall bay, service spine, and equipment access planning

Grid assumptions support modular coordination and future design validation.

Modular assembly opportunities

MEP racks, electrical skids, prefab wall panels, yard assemblies

Repetition is flagged for procurement and installation efficiency.

Low-carbon material direction

Low-carbon steel/concrete options and envelope optimization

Material direction is planning-grade until supplier and engineer input is available.

Robotics / prefab construction opportunities

Repetitive bays, rack installation, QA scanning, and layout automation

Automation opportunities are tied to predictable modules and laydown access.

Constructability and laydown risk

Medium-low with protected crane, truck, and laydown zones

Risk can increase if yards, stormwater, or access are compressed.

07

Cost range · Schedule path · Risk handoff
DCFR output

Cost, Schedule, Risk + Delivery Handoff

Cost, Schedule, Risk + Delivery Handoff

Organizes planning cost ranges, schedule exposures, long-lead items, final risk register items, and consultant handoff prompts for next-stage due diligence.

Preview detail register

Included in DCFR report
  • System-by-system planning cost ranges
  • Design / professional fee allowance categories
  • Design-phase schedule
  • Construction-phase critical path
  • Long-lead item register
  • Final risk register and consultant handoff checklist
Module valuePlanning outputConfirmation use

System-by-system cost ranges

Building shell, electrical/utility, generators, cooling, civil, fees, contingency

Ranges are planning-level and intended for next-step budgeting only.

Design-phase schedule

Due diligence → schematic/entitlement → design development/engineering

AHJ, utility, civil, and MEP confirmation shape design duration.

Construction-phase schedule

Site/civil, shell, utility, long-lead equipment, commissioning

Utility upgrades and electrical equipment remain critical-path drivers.

Critical-path risks

Power delivery, long-lead gear, water/sewer, AHJ/fire review, stormwater

Risk register identifies owner decisions and consultant assignments.

Consultant handoff checklist

Utility, civil, code/fire, MEP, acoustic, cost, geotech/environmental

Checklist supports immediate scoping for diligence teams.

Decision recommendation

Proceed with targeted utility, civil, AHJ, MEP, and cost confirmation

Recommendation is based on planning fit plus unresolved confirmation gates.

Methodology

What DCFR is based on

DCFR combines user-provided site inputs, rule-based data center planning logic, visible site/context constraints, and planning-grade calculation assumptions to produce an early feasibility judgment. Outputs clearly separate calculated assumptions from items that require utility, civil, code, environmental, legal, or licensed professional confirmation.

01

Client-provided inputs

Candidate addresses, parcel links, target program intent, and any shared site or context information.

02

Visible site/context conditions

Parcel configuration, access edges, surrounding uses, sensitive neighbors, apparent utility corridors, and visible constraints.

03

Planning-grade calculation logic

Buildable envelope, MW-to-acre reasonableness, support yard allowances, circulation, stormwater, buffers, and expansion calculations.

04

Rule-based data center assumptions

Early-stage allowances for data hall geometry, electrical and generator yards, cooling yards, fuel, fire access, and security perimeter.

05

DCFR findings + consultant handoff

Findings, risk flags, and structured handoff notes for utility, civil, code, MEP, cost, schedule, and design teams.

ARCHITECT-LED

Architect-led feasibility intelligence

DCFR was created by Jeehee Hong, NCARB, AIA, LEED GA, a New York State Registered Architect with 20+ years of experience across architecture, site planning, mixed-use development, logistics, and mission-critical feasibility thinking.

The platform is designed to help brokers, land teams, developers, investors, and site-selection teams screen data center land before deeper consultant engagement.

Architect-led does not mean the report is stamped, sealed, permit-ready, or a substitute for local licensed engineering, legal, zoning, environmental, utility, or code review.

SCOPE NOTE

What DCFR does not provide

DCFR is a planning-grade decision-support package. Final acquisition, design, permitting, financing, and construction decisions require professional confirmation. DCFR does not provide final engineering, stamped drawings, permit approval, legal zoning opinion, utility capacity guarantee, environmental clearance, contractor pricing, or authority approval.

  • Final engineering, stamped drawings, permit approval, construction documents, or permit drawings
  • Legal zoning opinion, entitlement approval, land-use approval, environmental clearance, brokerage advice, appraisal, lending advice, or investment advice
  • Utility capacity guarantee, interconnection approval, power reservation, tariff confirmation, or substation upgrade commitment
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, wetlands delineation, geotechnical report, ALTA/NSPS survey, traffic study, hydrology report, or acoustic engineering report
  • Final construction cost, guaranteed schedule, contractor pricing, equipment procurement pricing, or authority approval

Ready to compare candidate sites before acquisition momentum takes over?

Order the DCFR Report Package, submit the candidate addresses or parcel links you are considering, and advance the strongest site into a planning-grade selected-site report.