How it works

From candidate sites to development decisions.

DCFR helps land teams, brokers, developers, and investors screen up to 20 candidate sites, compare early feasibility signals, and select one parcel for a coordinated development decision report. Review the assumptions, compare the findings, and identify what must be confirmed next.

DCFR is optimized for U.S. sites. International screening depends on adequate local site and infrastructure data. Qualified local professionals and authorities must confirm code, fire, land-use, utility, environmental, and permitting requirements.

Workflow

A structured workflow for early data center site decisions

Submit candidate sites
Step 01

Submit candidate sites

Submit up to 20 candidate locations with the best available project information. Identify unknowns so they remain visible in the review.

Customer provides

  • Site address or parcel location
  • Approximate acreage
  • Target information technology load or capacity goal
  • Cooling preference, if known
  • Phasing or schedule target, if known
  • Known access, utility, zoning, or site concerns
DCFR screens the sites consistently
Step 02

DCFR screens the sites consistently

Each candidate is evaluated against the same planning criteria, making differences and information gaps easier to compare.

DCFR reviews

  • Gross acreage versus likely usable planning area
  • Parcel configuration and apparent buildable envelope
  • Target megawatt load against land demand
  • Power and utility exposure
  • Cooling and water strategy assumptions
  • Generator, electrical, cooling, and support-yard pressure
  • Parking, loading, fire/service access, and truck/service logic
  • Stormwater reserve, buffers, and sensitive-edge conditions
  • Early risk flags and confirmation-required items
Receive the preliminary 20-site comparison package
Step 03

Receive the preliminary 20-site comparison package

Use the comparison to shortlist, reject, or hold candidates for confirmation. Screening and detailed analysis runs are subject to your plan’s monthly allowance.

Customer receives

  • Preliminary 20-site comparison PDF / export package
  • Site-by-site comparison matrix
  • Feasibility signal per site: Likely Fit, Constrained Fit, Poor Fit, or Confirmation Required
  • Key constraint flags for each candidate site
  • Shortlist, hold, or reject recommendation
  • Exportable decision-support information where supported by the workflow
Select one site for the full DCFR report
Step 04

Select one site for the full DCFR report

Choose a shortlisted site for a full feasibility report. The seven-module analysis develops its capacity, constraints, development options, and next steps.

Selected full report includes

  • Preliminary decision gates and unresolved confirmations
  • Capacity scenarios and estimated area demand
  • Proportional area-budget diagram with explicit assumptions
  • Power, utility, cooling, water, and noise strategy review
  • Code, fire, authority, zoning, and sensitive-use exposure flags
  • Energy, heat-rejection and water-strategy considerations
  • Cost, schedule, entitlement, utility, and constructability risk summary
  • Confirmation-required register
  • Consultant handoff materials and recommended next steps

What you receive

The DCFR Platform

Compare candidates first, then develop a full report for a selected site.

Output 01

Preliminary 20-site comparison package

Compare up to 20 candidates and see which sites merit deeper review.

What you receive

  • Up to 20 submitted candidate sites
  • Consistent screening framework
  • Side-by-side comparison matrix
  • Feasibility signal per site
  • Key constraint and risk flags
  • Shortlist / hold / reject recommendation
  • Export-ready screening output where supported

Output 02

Full selected-site feasibility report

Develop one selected site into a seven-module planning report.

What you receive

  • Selected-site feasibility verdict
  • Site-fit and capacity logic
  • Planning-level area allocation
  • Technical site-layout and visual feasibility pages
  • Infrastructure and utility exposure review
  • Sustainability and low-carbon strategy
  • Risk register and confirmation register
  • Consultant handoff materials

Use the report

What your team can do with the report

Eight ways to move from candidate sites to a clearer land decision.

01

Compare

Compare parcels

See multiple candidate sites side by side before choosing one.

02

Filter

Reject weak sites

Spot major constraints early and avoid spending diligence on poor fits.

03

Prioritize

Build a shortlist

Identify the sites that deserve deeper review.

04

Identify risk

Find pressure points

See utility, access, stormwater, and support-yard concerns.

05

Estimate

Test the MW target

Check whether the target load appears reasonable for the site, or estimate a range when no target is given.

06

Confirm

Prepare for experts

Bring specific questions to consultants, utilities, and authorities.

07

Align

Support investment review

Give the team a shared basis for acquisition discussions.

08

Decide

Record the decision

Document the reasons and open questions before a letter of intent or land commitment.

DCFR identifies where professional due diligence, utility input, and authority confirmation are needed.

Review categories

What DCFR reviews

Site capacity and buildable fit

Site capacity and buildable fit

Submitted acreage, scenario-based building and support-yard demand, and circulation, stormwater and expansion allowances. Surveyed boundaries and physical site fit require separate confirmation.

Infrastructure exposure

Infrastructure exposure

Power, utility, cooling, water, generator, electrical yard, fuel, and infrastructure confirmation risks.

Access and operational logistics

Access and operational logistics

Parking, loading, truck/service movement, fire/service access, equipment replacement path, and security entry assumptions.

Site constraints and risk flags

Site constraints and risk flags

Stormwater reserve, sensitive edges, noise exposure, buffer requirements, zoning/code/AHJ exposure, environmental and civil confirmation items.

Sustainability and low-carbon strategy

Sustainability and low-carbon strategy

Energy and heat-rejection scenarios, water-strategy questions and materials considerations for follow-up. Project-specific sustainability scoring or certification review is separate.

Cost, schedule, and handoff

Cost, schedule, and handoff

Planning-level risk signals, likely next-step consultant needs, confirmation register, decision path, and handoff materials.

Methodology

What DCFR is based on

Five clear sources behind every early site decision.

What you provide

  • Site or parcel
  • Acreage and goals
  • Known project needs

What DCFR calculates

  • Potential MW range
  • Building and yard area budgets
  • Space for access and growth

What the site reveals

  • Parcel shape
  • Access and neighbors
  • Visible constraints

What DCFR assumes

  • Planning allowances
  • Equipment and circulation
  • Stormwater and buffers

What experts confirm

  • Utility service
  • Permits and code
  • Survey and site conditions

After the DCFR report

What still needs to be confirmed

DCFR identifies these questions in the report and tells your team what evidence to request next. The organizations listed below make the final determinations.

Available power and interconnection

Confirmed by: Utility provider

Permitted use and code requirements

Confirmed by: Local planning and building authorities

Grading, drainage, stormwater, and access

Confirmed by: Civil engineer and local agencies

Boundary, title, ground, environmental, and noise conditions

Confirmed by: Surveyor and specialist consultants

Fire access and safety requirements

Confirmed by: Fire authority and design professionals

Construction cost and schedule

Confirmed by: Contractor and project team

Permits and development approvals

Confirmed by: Approving authorities

DCFR is a planning report. It does not issue utility commitments, stamped designs, legal opinions, prices, or permits.

Clear analysis boundaries

Know what is calculated—and what needs further study.

Current planning report

  • Candidate screening and building / support-yard area budgets.
  • Facility demand and annual energy scenarios using stated PUE and load assumptions.
  • Annual onsite-water scenarios when WUE inputs are provided.
  • Scoped costs from dated quantity/rate inputs, with unpriced scope retained.
  • Dependency durations, float, and critical tasks when activity durations are supplied.
  • Source evidence, missing information, and confirmation actions.

Advanced comparison · in development

Quantified operating and embodied carbon, tariff-based operating costs, heat-reuse economics, and integrated alternative ranking are not included as validated calculations in the standard report.

These require local emissions factors, equipment performance, tariffs, material quantities, heat demand, and independent technical review. No carbon reduction, savings, or heat-sale revenue is guaranteed.

Screen candidate sites before committing to deeper due diligence.

Start with your candidate locations and the project information you already have.